Delta-v budget

Delta-v calculator: Hohmann transfers and plane changes

Enter two altitudes, an inclination change, spacecraft mass and specific impulse (Isp). Get the delta-v (Δv) for each burn, the total, the coast time on a transfer, and the propellant mass that total costs. The next decision the number feeds is propulsion choice.

How this model works & what it omits

Two-body impulsive astrodynamics. Hohmann / plane-change / combined / circularize / deorbit, with a per-burn breakdown. Tsiolkovsky rocket equation for propellant mass. Keplerian trade-study accuracy - flight design needs finite-burn losses + numerical propagation.

This is a Hohmann transfer calculator and general impulsive-maneuver budgeter: it computes the burns for a Hohmann transfer, a pure plane change, a combined transfer-plus-plane-change, a circularization, and a deorbit burn from the vis-viva equation - two-body Keplerian astrodynamics with Earth's gravitational parameter μ = 398,600.4418 km³/s² (Space Mission Analysis and Design (SMAD) ch. 6–7; Vallado 2013, ch. 6) - then converts the total delta-v to propellant mass with the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation. It is an engineering trade-study tool: fast first-order numbers for sizing and comparison; flight design adds finite-burn losses and numerical propagation.

A spacecraft changes orbit by changing velocity. The size of that velocity change - the delta-v (Δv) - is the single number that sizes a propulsion system: it sets how much propellant you carry, which sets the wet mass, which sets the launch cost. Get the delta-v budget wrong early and the whole mass budget unravels. This tool budgets five canonical maneuvers, each a distinct two-body impulsive problem.

Hohmann transfer - the minimum-energy coplanar path between two circular orbits: a burn to enter an elliptical transfer orbit, a half-orbit coast, then a second burn to circularize at the target altitude. Plane change - a pure inclination rotation at fixed altitude, costing Δv = 2·v·sin(θ/2); it is brutally expensive at orbital speed, which is why launch directly into the right inclination whenever possible. Combined - a Hohmann transfer with the plane change folded into the second burn at apogee, where orbital speed is lowest and rotating the plane is cheapest; the apogee burn becomes the vector sum (law of cosines) of the circularization and rotation. Circularize - a single burn at apogee turning an elliptical orbit circular. Deorbit - a single retrograde burn lowering perigee into the atmosphere (typically 50-80 km) so atmospheric drag does the rest.

Orbital speeds come from the vis-viva equation v = √(μ·(2/r − 1/a)), with Earth's gravitational parameter μ = 398,600.4418 km³/s². Once the total delta-v is known, the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation m_p = m₀·(1 − e^(−Δv/v_e)) converts it to propellant mass, where the exhaust velocity v_e = I_sp·g₀ is set by the propulsion type - cold gas ~70 s, monopropellant ~220 s, bipropellant ~320 s, electric 1,000-3,000 s. Higher specific impulse means more delta-v per kilogram of propellant; the exponential makes high-Δv missions punishingly propellant-hungry on low-I_sp systems.

What this tool does not capture: finite-burn (gravity) losses from non-impulsive thrust, low-thrust spiral transfers (an electric-propulsion mission does not fly a Hohmann), J2 and third-body perturbations, plane-change savings from bi-elliptic transfers, launch-window and phasing constraints, and propulsion-system dry-mass scaling. It is an engineering trade-study tool - fast first-order numbers for sizing and comparison, not a flight-design propagator.

pick a maneuver, then dial orbit geometry and propulsion.

Maneuver

two-body impulsive astrodynamics.

Orbit geometry

only the fields the chosen maneuver uses are active.

Propulsion

Tsiolkovsky rocket equation: m_p = m0 (1 − e^(−Δv/ve)).

ve ≈ 2.157 km/s

Delta-v budget: 216.7 m/s total, 19.11 kg propellant, 9.6% propellant fraction.

Delta-v budget

Hohmann transfer (altitude change) · 2 burns

216.7 m/s

Total delta-v

19.11 kg

Propellant mass

9.6%

Propellant fraction

180.9 kg

Final (dry) mass

48.3 min

Transfer time

per-burn breakdown

1Perigee raise burn109.1 m/s

50% of total budget

2Apogee circularize burn107.6 m/s

50% of total budget

Total Δv216.7 m/s

delta-v by burn

Perigee raise burn109 m/sApogee circularize burn108 m/s
Take it with you
Let AI accelerate your design. Carry this work forward into our engineering studio.Continue in ENKI AI Space Studio

Worked example

How much delta-v does a Hohmann transfer take?

This is the LEO altitude raise preset, and you can load it in the calculator above. A 200 kg spacecraft in a circular 400 km orbit raises to a circular 800 km orbit on a monopropellant system with a specific impulse (Isp) of 220 s. Two burns, one coast:

1. Perigee burn
~109 m/s
enters the transfer ellipse
2. Coast
~48 min
half the transfer orbit
3. Apogee burn
~108 m/s
circularizes at 800 km
Total Δv
~217 m/s
costs ~19.1 kg of propellant

That is the intuition worth keeping for low Earth orbit (LEO): raising a circular orbit by a few hundred kilometres costs a couple of hundred metres per second. The 19.1 kg of propellant is 9.6% of the 200 kg wet mass, from the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation at 220 s Isp.

The next decision: what propulsion you fly

The delta-v is fixed by the orbits. The propellant is not: it is set by specific impulse through the rocket equation. At a delta-v this small the propellant tracks close to 1/Isp; the exponential only bites once the delta-v approaches the exhaust velocity. The same ~217 m/s on the same 200 kg wet mass:

Propulsion Isp Propellant Share of wet mass
Cold gas ~70 s ~54.1 kg 27.1%
Monopropellant ~220 s ~19.1 kg 9.6%
Bipropellant ~320 s ~13.3 kg 6.7%

Cold gas costs about four times the propellant of bipropellant for the identical maneuver, a difference of roughly 40 kg in propellant allocation. That is not a like-for-like system comparison: this model excludes propulsion hardware dry-mass scaling, so the tank, feed system and thrusters still have to be sized before you know what the change is worth. Electric propulsion is deliberately absent from the table: a low-thrust vehicle spirals rather than flying a two-impulse Hohmann, so this page's impulsive model does not cover the trajectory it would fly. Once you have picked a row, the CubeSat propulsion calculator sizes the tank, thruster and burn time around it.

Common questions

Why is a plane change so expensive?

Because it rotates the whole velocity vector at orbital speed: Δv = 2·v·sin(θ/2). At 420 km, v ≈ 7.66 km/s, so rotating the plane a single degree costs ~134 m/s - more than half the price of the entire 400 → 800 km altitude raise. The International Space Station (ISS)-inclination preset rotates 51.6° in place: ≈ 6.7 km/s, which the rocket equation turns into ~88% of the 200 kg spacecraft's mass as bipropellant. The practical rules: launch into the right inclination, and if you must rotate, fold the change into the apogee burn where speed is lowest (the combined maneuver).

How do I convert delta-v to propellant mass?

With the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation: m_p = m₀·(1 − e^(−Δv/v_e)), where the exhaust velocity v_e = I_sp·g₀ is set by the propulsion type - specific impulse (Isp) of ~70 s for cold gas, ~220 s for monopropellant, ~320 s for bipropellant, 1,000–3,000 s for electric. The exponential makes high-Δv missions punishingly propellant-hungry on low-Isp systems. To turn that propellant mass into tank, thruster, and burn-time sizing, hand the total to the CubeSat propulsion calculator.

How much delta-v does it take to deorbit from 500 km?

The controlled-deorbit preset drops perigee from a 500 km circular orbit to 60 km with a single retrograde burn of ≈ 127 m/s - atmospheric drag does the rest. On the preset's 150 kg spacecraft at 220 s Isp, that is roughly 8.6 kg of propellant. To check whether natural decay alone already meets the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 5-year rule - and to size the disposal burn against each regime's limit - use the satellite deorbit compliance calculator.

Is a Hohmann transfer always the cheapest way to change orbits?

It is the minimum-energy two-impulse transfer between coplanar circular orbits - the right default for a chemical-propulsion trade study. Two caveats from the omissions list above: for very large radius ratios a bi-elliptic (three-burn) transfer can undercut it, and a low-thrust electric mission does not fly a Hohmann at all - it spirals out continuously, accumulating more total delta-v over a much longer transfer. Both need tools beyond this one's impulsive two-body model.

References

  • Wertz, J. R., Everett, D. F., Puschell, J. J. (2011). Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD, ch. 6-7 (Orbit & Constellation Design, Δv budgets).
  • Vallado, D. A. (2013). Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, 4th ed., ch. 6 (Orbital Maneuvering).
  • Hohmann, W. (1925). Die Erreichbarkeit der Himmelskörper. Oldenbourg, Munich.
  • Tsiolkovsky, K. E. (1903). Exploration of Outer Space by Means of Rocket Devices.
  • Curtis, H. D. (2014). Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students, 3rd ed., ch. 6 (Orbital Maneuvers).
ICARUS Engineering mission patch Built by ICARUS Engineering